The negotiations to avoid war between the
Pandava and the Kaurava brothers had failed and war was imminent. Duryodhana appealed
to the kings who had chosen to fight for him to give him victory. They told him
that the Pandavas themselves were great warriors and with Krishna on their
side, they were invincible. Notwithstanding all this, they would fight for him
with full commitment and while having darshan (sacred viewing) of Shri Krishna
on Arjuna’s chariot, they would fall in the battlefield and attain moksa
(liberation).
Duryodhana turned to Bhishma. He told him that
many great kings and warriors had joined his side and in contrast Yudhisthira’s
army was small. Would the huge Kaurava army not vanquish the small Pandava army
easily, he asked the venerable Bhishma. Bhishma said the question was not how large
his army was and how large the enemy’s. It was within Bhurishrava’s power to
send them all to the abode of the god of death within three days. Shalya could end the war in two days and
Aswasthama, in one day. Karna could do so in three praharas (three quarters of a day) and guru Drona, in two. He could
do so in one prahara and Arjuna could
do so in just a muhurta (moment).
When he fought, continued Bhishma, his hands
and fist shook, when Drona fought, his chest would palpitate fast and likewise
every great warrior present there had one such problem or the other. Only Arjuna
was not troubled by any problem of that sort. This apart, Arjuna had defeated
Lord Shiva and pleased with him, the greatest of the gods, had given him the
infallible arrow, named Pashupata. He had defeated Indra, the king of the gods
and the other gods in Khandava forest. He had defeated the incomparable Balarama
and later, Krishna himself. Only the other day, he had defeated the entire
Kaurava army in the war in the kingdom of Virata. His manavedi arrow was so powerful that everyone in the battle field fell
unconscious. Arjuna was indeed unconquerable, said Bhishma.
Duryodhana understood the situation. He asked
Bhishma if there was some way to contain Arjuna. Bhishma said there was one. A
rule could be made with the consent of all the warriors to the effect that
weapons received from the gods must not be used in the war. He suggested to Duryodhana
that he must invite the Pandavas to Hastinapura. They all would persuade them
to accept a war code. Both sides must work out the code together and both sides
must commit themselves to it. Sakuni was entrusted with the task of bringing the
Pandavas from Jayanta (pronounced as jayantaa), where they were staying, to
Hastinapura.
Bhishma knew that wars are not always won or
lost in the battlefields. That raises the question about the nature of the
heroic acts on the battlefield and more importantly, of the meaning of victory
or defeat there. How fettered, for instance, was the defeated - by a curse or a
promise made to someone dear or revered, or to self or by a rule or a personal
value and the like?
Sakuni went to Jayanta and told Yudhisthira
that he had come at Duryodhana’s behest to invite them to Hastinapura where they
and the other warriors would work out a war code. Bhima did not like the idea
of going there. “Why didn’t the Kuru king come here?” asked Bhima. “Why should
we go there? Are we in his service that we would be at his beck and call?” he
asked Sakuni. Sakuni said that at Hastinapura, there were the Kuru elders, many
kings from many kingdoms and many others; so there could be arguments and
discussions while making the code. Besides, going there should not be viewed as
a humiliation for them; after all, one day that place might be theirs, he said
(kale tumbhakain prapata hoiba sehisthana).
No one responded to the last part of what he said. Quite rightly, one might
think – in a war one side would win. Might be the winner in that war would be the
Pandavas, but that would hardly be something to talk about at that point in
time, especially when it was Sakuni, who Yudhithira considered utterly
dishonest, had said so and in the casual way he had said it.
So the Pandavas went to Hastinapura with
Krishna. They were fondly welcomed at Hastinapura and there was bonhomie among
the Kauravas and the Pandavas. In the presence of all, Yudhisthira asked
Sahadeva when the war should start. Sahadeva said the very next day – Tuesday,
the dwithiya tithi (the second day) of
the month of Magh - would be good for the purpose. Everyone agreed.
Duryodhana said,” Listen, O son of Dharma, in
the battlefield brothers will be fighting with brothers. Let us fight without
any negative feelings towards each other– let there be no malice or hatred in
our heart. Let there be no bitterness or hypocrisy. This will be the war of
dharma and the witness will be the Supreme god Narayana Himself. Dharma will win
the war”.
Now, would Duryodhana have said what he did if
he did not believe that he had done nothing wrong with regard to sharing the
kingdom of Hastinapura with the Pandavas, no matter who all had said things to
the contrary? In Duryodhana’s tone there was no insincerity, no hypocrisy. And for
him, giving half the kingdom would be sharing the kingdom, as would be giving
one village. No one goes to war under the banner of adharma. Duryodhana had no
doubt in his mind that he wasn’t.
Then he said, “Let no one use the divine
weapons. Let no one use weapons the use of which one hasn’t learnt from one’s
guru (preceptor). Let Arjuna not use manavedi
arrow. Let warriors kill during the war but become loving friends once the
fighting stopped for the day and then they must sit together and enjoy the
togetherness.” Everyone agreed. “No one
must violate the code. Narayana would be the witness. The one who does, would
suffer”, said Duryodhana. The Pandavas and the Kauravas took the oath to abide
by the code.
Bhishma’s objective was to disempower Arjuna;
it was just that it was not he but King Duryodhana who had articulated what he
wanted. Pandavas surely did not fail to understand Duryodhana’s motive, but
they did not say anything by way of exposing him.
No one, neither the Pandavas nor the Kauravas,
mentioned the infallible weapon Karna had received from god Indra. Everyone
knew that he had decided to use it against Arjuna alone. With that weapon,
Karna could have effectively won the war for Duryodhana. Now, the code
disempowered Karna too. There is nothing in the narrative that explains why
that weapon did not figure in the deliberations. The following might give a
clue.
After the war code was accepted, Bhishma spoke.
“You have taken the vow”, he told Krishna, “that you would only be the charioteer
of Arjuna and not wield a weapon. O, the One of infinite kindness, O, the One with
boundless benevolence for His devotees, know that I am the servant of your
servant. I know that you will break your oath. On my account, you will wield a
weapon.”
“You have taken avatara to reduce the burden of
the earth. You will be the witness in the war for both sides. We will fall in
the battlefield, looking at you and will be rid of the burden of our sins of
countless existences”. With that, the meeting ended. Those who had assembled
there left for their respective places of stay. The Pandavas returned to
Jayanta. They had to make preparations for the war to start on the following
day.
Krishna did not say anything. On the sixth day
of the battle, Bhishma attacked Arjuna with an infallible divine arrow and
Arjuna had no arrow to neutralize it. Unseen by everyone in the battlefield
except Hanuman on the top of Arjuna’s chariot, Krishna destroyed it with his
Sudarshana chakra. And on the ninth day, Krishna rushed to Bhishma’s chariot
with Sudarshana chakra in his hand, setting aside details, and everyone saw
that. Everyone saw that Krishna had broken his vow. Bhishma had won. Narayana
would never disappoint His devotee.
Returning to the non-mention of Indra-given
weapon to Karna in the discussion, maybe Bhishma knew it would be ineffectual.
He knew Krishna would intervene if there would be threat to Arjuna’s life. And
when the Avatara had chosen to protect Arjuna, which weapon in all the brahmandas could harm him!
No comments:
Post a Comment