tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8385585168638185203.post7096616076130368383..comments2023-10-17T14:25:05.693+05:30Comments on Sarala Mahabharat: SAKUNI’S ENDB.N.Patnaikhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08758591513346337483noreply@blogger.comBlogger10125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8385585168638185203.post-33353241961304934412016-07-10T23:11:41.937+05:302016-07-10T23:11:41.937+05:30I agree with your observation on this great and no...I agree with your observation on this great and noble character. In Sarala Mahabharata, he is a much nobler and virtuous character than in Vyasa Mahabharata. He did not call Draupadi a fallen woman because he knew that he was the eldest son of Kunti. This is what everyone knew in Sarala Mahabharata right from the beginning almost. This is a significant difference between Sarala Mahabharata and Vyasa Mahabharata. In Sarala's version, he fell like Bhishma and Drona and not like a villain. He died because like Drona, he had fought for the Kauravas. B.N.Patnaikhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08758591513346337483noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8385585168638185203.post-59695653078894813672016-07-10T20:00:54.135+05:302016-07-10T20:00:54.135+05:30Karna is not a pure sinister he is humiliated alwa...Karna is not a pure sinister he is humiliated always I every scale he is better than every pandavas but the word for draupadi and his lie to teacher cause his fall but as a hero not a villianAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08157117090077383119noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8385585168638185203.post-1517501628187750942016-04-27T17:50:45.661+05:302016-04-27T17:50:45.661+05:30
Actually indefinitely many read Vyasa Mahabharata...<br />Actually indefinitely many read Vyasa Mahabharata in comparison with Mahabharatas composed in regional languages. I do not think any of these is available in English translation. The regional language narratives, be it in Odia or Telugu or Kannada or Bengali, etc. deviate from the Vyasa version in many ways. These differences express the poetic vision of the poets concerned. These poets, I presume, have been great devotees of Bhagawan Krishna. Sarala is, as he says so in his retelling. B.N.Patnaikhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08758591513346337483noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8385585168638185203.post-78406884877716090102016-04-27T17:29:54.532+05:302016-04-27T17:29:54.532+05:30It's there in blog Sarala 'Created'Sha...It's there in blog Sarala 'Created'Shakuni Character. So it's fiction that suits individual traits.Madhavhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00373546886318170783noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8385585168638185203.post-33705389509896780712016-04-27T17:28:09.854+05:302016-04-27T17:28:09.854+05:30But who reads original Vyasa's Mahabharata and...But who reads original Vyasa's Mahabharata and everyone cooks his own Mahabharata. No dearth of people to follow such fictional MB.Madhavhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00373546886318170783noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8385585168638185203.post-16794971366418623272014-07-14T18:12:43.149+05:302014-07-14T18:12:43.149+05:30whose ever mahabhabharatha it is it will be a tran...whose ever mahabhabharatha it is it will be a translation from the original written by sri vyasa in sanskrit. krishna is narayana, and narayana is the embodiment of dharma. so sri krishna can never commit an adharmic act. in the original mahabharatha sri krishna goaded arjuna to kill karna as he was responsible for all the miseries of the pandavas. karna on one hand was pleading to arjuna not to stop fighting as he was on ground and hence handicapped. but at the same time was releasing arrows on arjuna. this was very clearly, i repeat very clearly written by sri vyasa. this was why sri krishna told arjuna to kill karna- an adharmic man to the core.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17026009626736742752noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8385585168638185203.post-15471368081977748552014-04-12T02:28:08.580+05:302014-04-12T02:28:08.580+05:30wow the blogger only allows posts favoring him. Su...wow the blogger only allows posts favoring him. Such a useless forumAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07407560047899949312noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8385585168638185203.post-50793511496107517282014-04-07T22:16:28.366+05:302014-04-07T22:16:28.366+05:30Awesome stuff...Awesome stuff...Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06359873428673811104noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8385585168638185203.post-890637894997099532014-02-10T12:21:18.381+05:302014-02-10T12:21:18.381+05:30wonderful sire...very nice postwonderful sire...very nice postUnknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16651405029723254639noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8385585168638185203.post-22155259092144495432009-02-16T13:05:00.000+05:302009-02-16T13:05:00.000+05:30awesome analysis. a very thoughful post.awesome analysis. a very thoughful post.Lakshmihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09374672001529827502noreply@blogger.com